The Best iGaming Operator & Company Databases (2026)

What a B2B team needs from an iGaming operator database

Before comparing names, be honest about the job. A general-purpose business directory will list a few hundred gambling brands, but an iGaming operator database built for B2B has to do four things generic sources rarely do well. First, it must distinguish operators from vendors — the brand that holds the licence and takes bets versus the platform, studio or payments company that supplies it — because those are different buyers. Second, it needs licence and jurisdiction data, since who an operator is regulated by determines what you can legally sell them and where. Third, it should surface change: launches, market entries, licence grants, funding and leadership moves that tell you when to reach out. Fourth, it needs verified, reachable decision-maker contacts, because a list of company names with no path to a human is just trivia.

Most sources are strong on one or two of those and weak on the rest. That is the lens for everything below — not "which is best" in the abstract, but which trade-offs fit your motion. To skip ahead to the targetable approach, our own operator directory is filterable by licence, jurisdiction and signal out of the box.

Casino City Press

Casino City Press is one of the oldest and most comprehensive references in gambling, spanning land-based and online operators, suppliers and a long catalogue of industry data products and printed directories. For sheer historical breadth — including the brick-and-mortar world — it is hard to beat, and its longevity gives the data a credibility newer entrants have to earn. If you need a wide reference atlas of the global gambling industry, it earns its place.

The trade-offs are about format and intent. It is built as a reference and publishing business, not a sales-enablement tool, so it leans toward directories and reports rather than live filtering, deal signals and exportable contact lists. Online-only iGaming is a subset of a broader land-based and lottery focus, and verified B2B contacts with GDPR-aware sourcing are not the core product. If your bottleneck is building a targeted outreach list this quarter, expect a lot of manual stitching. We lay out the specifics in our iGaming Operators vs Casino City Press comparison.

SBC Directory

The SBC Directory comes from SBC, a major events and media brand in sports betting and iGaming. Its strength is the ecosystem around it: the listings sit alongside conferences, awards and news, so company profiles carry real industry context and visibility. For vendors and operators who want to be discovered — and for buyers scoping the supplier landscape ahead of an event — it is a useful, well-trafficked map of who's who.

As a sales database, though, its character is closer to a self-serve listing and visibility platform than a targetable, filterable dataset. Profiles are often supplier-submitted, which is great for vendor discovery but less suited to building a precise iGaming operator list filtered by licence status or jurisdiction, with verified contacts attached. Depth of structured operator firmographics and deal-signal tracking is not the primary design goal. Our iGaming Operators vs SBC Directory page breaks down where each fits in a B2B workflow.

iGaming Business / World Gaming Directory

iGaming Business is one of the most established media brands in the sector, and its associated World Gaming Directory functions as a broad industry listing of operators, suppliers and service providers. The editorial authority is the draw: the brand sits close to the news, regulatory developments and the people moving the market, making it a strong place to understand context and reputation.

The limitation follows the media-led directory pattern. A directory attached to a publisher is optimised for browsing and discovery, not for precise, exportable, signal-aware targeting. Expect strong company coverage and weaker support for filtering by licence and jurisdiction, tracking buying triggers, or pulling verified contacts at scale — an excellent reading room and a partial database. The full breakdown lives on our iGaming Operators vs iGaming Business comparison.

iGamingSuppliers and iGaming Select

It is worth grouping the more vendor-and-marketplace-oriented directories, because they share a similar shape. iGamingSuppliers is geared toward helping operators find vendors — a supplier marketplace and discovery layer — while iGaming Select positions as a curated directory and matchmaking resource connecting operators with providers. Both are genuinely useful when the job is vendor discovery: an operator scoping a new payments partner or game studio gets a curated shortlist without cold research.

For an outbound B2B team trying to build an iGaming operator database to sell into, the fit is weaker. These are largely supplier-facing or matchmaking tools, often relying on self-listed profiles, with the emphasis on connection rather than structured, filterable operator firmographics, licence data, deal signals and verified outbound contacts. They complement an operator-targeting dataset rather than replace it.

• Best for vendor discovery: iGamingSuppliers, iGaming Select — find suppliers, get matched, browse curated profiles.
• Best for breadth and reference: Casino City Press — widest historical and land-based coverage.
• Best for context and visibility: SBC Directory, iGaming Business / World Gaming Directory — event- and media-linked reputation.
• Best for targetable outbound: iGaming Operators — filter by licence and jurisdiction, act on deal signals, reveal verified contacts.

iGaming Operators: a targetable iGaming operator database

Here we are honest about our own edge rather than claiming to beat every tool on every axis. iGaming Operators is not the broadest reference atlas, and it is not a vendor matchmaking marketplace. It is built for one job: letting a B2B sales, partnerships or compliance team turn the iGaming market into a targetable, actionable list. That means structured operator and vendor records you can filter by licence and jurisdiction, real-time deal signals — launches, market entries, licence grants, funding, leadership changes — that tell you when a window is open, and verified decision-maker contacts revealed on a credit basis with GDPR-aware sourcing built in.

The media and event directories give you context; the supplier marketplaces give you discovery. The gap they share is action: you still cannot easily build a filtered iGaming operator list, see who just became reachable, and email the right person without leaving the tool. That is the slice iGaming Operators is designed to own. It will not replace Casino City Press as a land-based reference, and does not try to — the honest positioning is complementary: read the market with the directories, work it with a targetable database.

Comparing the options side by side

The table below scores each source on the dimensions that matter for a B2B motion. "Strong" means a primary design goal; "partial" means present but not the focus; "limited" means don't rely on it. It is a fit map, not a league table — a tool marked limited on outbound may still be the best choice if your job is vendor discovery or market reading.

How to choose for your team

The decision comes down to where your pipeline stalls. For market research, scoping the landscape, or historical and land-based breadth, a reference like Casino City Press or a media directory like iGaming Business is the natural home. If you are an operator hunting for a supplier, the matchmaking directories shortcut your search. But if your team's job is to sell into operators and vendors — and your bottleneck is building a precise, current, contactable target list — you need a database designed for targeting, not browsing.

A practical pattern many teams land on: use the editorial and event directories for context and credibility, then run outbound off a targetable igaming b2b directory that carries licence data, deal signals and verified contacts together. That avoids paying for breadth you won't action while keeping the list current and reachable. See how the targeting model is priced — credit-based for contact reveals, no per-seat lock-in on the data — on our pricing page, and weigh the full set of head-to-heads on the comparison hub.

Summary

There is no universally best iGaming operator database — only the best fit for a job. Casino City Press leads on breadth and land-based reference; SBC Directory and iGaming Business bring event and editorial context; iGamingSuppliers and iGaming Select shine at vendor discovery and matchmaking. Each is genuinely good at what it was built for, and a serious team often uses more than one. Where iGaming Operators earns its place is the action layer the others were not designed to provide: an operator and vendor dataset you can filter by licence and jurisdiction, real-time deal signals that tell you when to move, and verified, GDPR-aware decision-maker contacts. Read the market with the directories; work it with a targetable database. Browse the operator directory, compare the options on the comparison hub, and see the model on the pricing page when you're ready to turn a list into pipeline.